Implementing ERP with Downstream Applications: Strategies for Decommissioning  Introduction 

Introduction 

In today’s fast-changing business world, firms use ERP systems. They aim to improve operations and data management. ERP systems integrate many business processes into a unified system. This streamlines data handling and oversight. But integrating ERP systems with downstream apps presents big opportunities and challenges. Downstream apps interact with or depend on the ERP. This blog covers the need for integration, its challenges, and ways to decommission redundant downstream apps. 

Overview of ERP and Downstream Applications 

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems are platforms. They manage and automate core business functions. These include finance, HR, supply chain, and customer relationships. ERP systems centralize data. They provide a single source of truth for processes.  

Specialized tools downstream interact with the ERP system. These can include CRM software, supply chain systems, or industry apps. These apps serve specific functions that the ERP system may not address completely. 

Importance of Integrating ERP with Downstream Applications for Data Management 

Integrating ERP systems with downstream applications is vital for effective data management. Seamless integration allows data to flow between systems. It reduces redundancy and improves accuracy. This integration helps decision-making, boosts efficiency, and ensures consistency across business units. 

Challenges and Impacts 

Data consistency and accuracy 

  • Challenge: Keeping data updated in all systems can be difficult. Discrepancies in data formats, structures, or real-time updates can lead to inaccuracies. 
  • Impact: Inconsistent data can result in erroneous reporting, financial discrepancies, and operational inefficiencies. 

Complexity of Integration 

  • Challenge: Integrating ERP systems with many downstream apps is complex. It involves mapping data fields, aligning formats, and managing different schemas. 
  • Impact: High complexity can cause delays, high demand of time, and a need for tech experts. 

Real-Time Data Processing 

  • Challenge: It’s tough to sync real-time data between ERP and downstream apps, especially with large data volumes. 
  • Impact: Delays in data sync can cause outdated info. This affects decisions and efficiency. 

User Training and Adoption 

  • Challenge: Train users to use the new integrated systems and workflows. 
  • Impact: Poor training can lead to user errors, resistance to change, and a less effective system. 

 

Case Study where ERP Compared with other system 

  • HCM (Human Capital Management) and CRM (Customer Relationship Management)  

Used When: To manage your workforce and customers. Ideal for businesses that prioritize employee growth and customer engagement. This includes service-oriented companies.  

Benefits: Improved HR and customer processes raise employee and customer satisfaction. 

  • SCM, FIN, and CX  

Used When: You need to manage supply chains, financial operations, and improve customer experience. This is common in manufacturing and retail. There, delivery and finances are critical.  

Benefits: Optimized supply chains cut costs. Strong finances ensure sustainability. Better CX boosts brand loyalty. 

  • HCM, CRM, SCM, FIN, and CX Combined  

Used When: Your organization needs a unified approach across all functions. It’s vital for large firms in competitive markets to have cohesive strategies.  

Benefits: A unified system boosts communication and data sharing. It aligns strategies across departments, increasing efficiency and growth. 

            By assessing your business needs and goals, you can find the best mix of these systems for peak performance. 

Before implementing an ERP system, check what functions existing systems can manage. We can group this analysis into three types: doable, tweakable, and non-doable cases. 

  1. Doable Cases

These are functions that other systems can handle, with little change. Examples:

  • Inventory Management: Many standalone systems can track stock, manage reorders, and provide reports. 
  • Customer Relationship Management (CRM): CRM systems can manage customer interactions and sales pipelines. They do this without an ERP. 
  • Accounting and Financial Management: Good accounting software can handle financial tasks and reports. 

Implication: In these cases, organizations may keep existing systems. They already meet operational needs efficiently. 

  1. Tweakable Cases

Other systems can perform these functions. But, they need customization or integration to match the ERP’s capabilities. Examples:

  • Human Resources Management: HR software can manage employee records and payroll. But, it may need customization to fit the organization’s processes. It should also work with other systems, like finance and inventory. 
  • Supply Chain Management: Existing systems may support logistics. But, they may need extra setup to ensure full tracking and reporting across the supply chain. 
  • Project Management: Project management tools can track tasks and timelines. But, integrating financial data from accounting software may need custom solutions. 

Implication: Organizations may invest in customization to improve efficiency. But, it may raise costs and complexity. 

  1. Non-Doable Cases

These are functions that existing systems can’t manage. They are limited by tech or poor integration. Examples:

  • Comprehensive Reporting: Some systems can generate reports. But, they often can’t pull data from multiple sources. So, they can’t create insights across departments. 
  • Regulatory Compliance: Many standalone systems are not integrated. They can’t automate compliance processes. This makes it hard to manage documentation and reporting. 
  • Integrated Workflow Management: Standalone systems may not support the ERP’s end-to-end workflow. This can cause gaps in communication and efficiency. 

Implication: For these cases, an ERP system may be vital. No other solution can fully replicate its required functions. It is key for efficiency and compliance. 

Objective and key Steps for Decommissioning Downstream Applications 

Phase 1: Assessment and Identification 

  1. Identify Low-Value Applications
  • Objective: Identify applications that are non-essential or of little value to the organization. 

Key Steps 

Compile a List of Downstream Applications  Conduct a Value Assessment  Prioritize Applications 
  1. Evaluate Integration Feasibility
  • Objective: Assess the applications’ integration with the ERP and other systems. This will help us understand the complexity of decommissioning. 

Key Steps 

Map Integration Points  Review Integration Contracts and SLAs  Develop a Decommissioning Strategy 

  

Phase 2: Planning and Communication 

  1. Develop a Decommissioning Plan
  • Objective: Create a detailed plan for decommissioning the identified applications. 

Key Steps 

Define Objectives and Scope  Create a Timeline  Assign Responsibilities and Identify Resources 
  1. Communicate with Stakeholders
  • Objective: Inform all relevant parties about the decommissioning process and their roles. 

Key Steps 

Develop Communication Plan  Conduct Briefings  Provide Training and Support 

  

Phase 3: Execution and Migration 

  1. Migrate Data and Processes
  • Objective: Transfer or archive data and adjust processes to ensure continuity after decommissioning. 

Key Steps 

Data Migration  Process Transition  Test Data and Processes 

 

Conclusion 

In today’s fast-changing business world, we must link ERP systems with downstream apps. This optimizes data management and boosts efficiency. This integration improves data accuracy and reduces redundancy. It streamlines business processes. The result is better decision-making and higher performance. But, the integration process has challenges. These include data consistency, system complexity, and real-time processing issues. Effective decommissioning of redundant downstream apps needs a phased approach. Start with assessment and identification. Then, plan and communicate in detail. Finally, execute and migrate. By addressing these aspects, organizations can ensure a smooth transition. Their systems will then be efficient, accurate, and aligned with business goals. 

Call To Action 

To maximize the benefits of ERP integration with downstream apps, organizations must be strategic. Start by checking your downstream apps for redundancy and low value. Next, assess the feasibility of integrating these apps with your ERP system. This will help you understand the complexities involved. Make a detailed decommissioning plan. Communicate well with all stakeholders. This will ensure a smooth transition. Execute the migration with precision. It is vital to ensure data integrity and process continuity. These steps will help your organization. They will streamline operations, improve data accuracy, and boost efficiency. Begin your decommissioning process today. It will optimize your ERP integration and improve business outcomes. 

 

APEX vs VBCS: How to make the right choice?

Low code tool is new buzzword here from sometime now. Platforms which enabled developer community to produce applications, with fraction of efforts and very few line of codes. These platforms empower developers to create software solutions with minimal manual coding, leveraging visual interfaces, pre-built components, and drag-and-drop functionality.

Absolutely, Oracle has recognized the importance of low-code development and has positioned itself as a key player in this space. Instead of one, Oracle has 2 solutions in Low-Code tool space: APEX (Application Express) and VBCS (Visual Builder Cloud Service). But Why 2 low-code tools? What is oracle doing? & Which tool to choose as developer or end customer?

Here are how oracle places both tools on its site:

APEX:

VBCS:

The main difference is clear in title itself – APEX: “Data Driven Application” & VBCS: “Build Extensions for cloud applications”.

Apex is here from around 20 Years, and it is one of the oracle’s prime development tools. They have invested a lot into it and improved it constantly. Although it builds very robust modern looking webapps but at the core it uses simple SQL and PLSQL. Old school developers find this very friendly. It can be run on cloud or on premise. This tool is for both citizen and professional developers. Citizen developers are those who knows only very basics of coding and intend to create lighter applications. It allows developers to leverage their SQL and PL/SQL skills to build data-centric applications rapidly.

On the other hand, VBCS is a newer addition to Oracle’s low-code offerings. The reason was to have a tool which truly cloud, web-based platform using JavaScript. VBCS is based on Oracle JET, which stands for JavaScript Extension Toolkit. JavaScript is de facto standard for web application development. It gives web application developer an advanced experience of what they generally do. It supports git management, docker and CI/CD which makes it more robust from DevOps perspective. For simpler apps it is near no-code. The main use case of VBCS is for expanding and add extensions to any oracle cloud service like oracle fusion. VBCS integrates seamlessly with other Oracle Cloud services, making it a compelling choice for organizations already invested in Oracle’s cloud ecosystem. The data source is generally a rest end points, making it truly neutral to database. One of the main advantages is its ability to create truly native mobile application.

APEX VBCS
Positioning 20x Faster w 100X less code Extensions to oracle cloud apps
Cost Free with oracle database. $ per OCPU. It counts message packs in relation to active users and OIC integration calls it makes
Data Source: Developer Mindset Oracle Database: You can think of as a relational data model structure underneath  Rest End points: Plan/Design Rest endpoints carefully. It can be any rest enabled database schema also
DevOPS APEX Team Development: APEX Maintains application inside database hence do not compatible with DevOps Tools Visual Builder Studio: Better than APEX DevOps as it supports git, CI/CD, Docker etc. Visual Builder has better product life cycle management
WebAPP Y Y
Mobile Application development Y
Oracle SaaS extensions Y
Product Maturity and bigger community Y
Deployment It sits on top of Oracle Database hence it is tightly coupled with it. APEX can be deployed at both on-premise or on cloud It is neutral to oracle database and truly webapp/mobileApp development platform. Deployed on-cloud.
Developer Skill as Prerequisites SQL & PLSQL Javascript, Rest, Oracle Jet, Database

So now let’s try to answer the questions we raised initially:

Why two low-code tools instead of one?

The decision likely stems from Oracle’s recognition that different developers have different preferences, skill sets, and project requirements. By offering both APEX and VBCS, Oracle can cater to a wider audience and provide solutions tailored to various use cases. Additionally, having multiple low-code platforms allows Oracle to address different aspects of application development, from data-centric applications with APEX to more modern, user interface-focused applications with VBCS. This strategy enables Oracle to stay competitive in the rapidly evolving low-code development market and better serve the diverse needs of its customers.

Which to Choose?

Go for VBCS if require oracle fusion extension app. Go for VBCS if want mobile application. Go for VBCS if want truly platform neutral webapp.

Go for APEX if current skillset if SQL/PLSQL. Go for APEX if want to keep maintenance cost low.

By considering these factors, organizations or developers can make informed decisions about which Oracle low-code platform best suits their specific requirements and goals. Whether prioritizing skill compatibility, cost-effectiveness, or specialized functionalities, Oracle offers options to meet diverse needs in application development.

Conclusion:

It is indeed a tale of 2 siblings. Both are children of powerful father named Oracle. Both, APEX and VBCS, benefit from Oracle’s vast resources, developer community, user group and commitment to provide an ease to learn & continuous product improvement.

Elder One, APEX, is traditional old-school (SQL/PLSQL), robust, proven, well established in life and conservative with money (free with DB).

The younger child, VBCS, is modern (JavaScript, mobile & true webapp), innovative, looking to solve many futuristic problems, expensive but promising.